by Antonio R. Rodriguez, Joseph J. Wolski
As presented at the 2019 Winter Simulation Conference
The NIH, a component of the U.S. HHS, launched Optimize NIH to improve organizational effectiveness and performance in support of the NIH mission. Optimize NIH focused efforts for achieving efficiencies in business processes of Committee Management, Ethics, and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) functions through enterprise-wide improvements. A computer modeling and simulation approach was utilized to develop a greater understanding of these business processes and inform recommendations for improvement. The project team developed process maps, gathered data, and developed a computer model and simulation that was used to better understand resources needed to process requests and how to best deploy those resources organization-wide. The modeling approach developed for this activity and lessons learned can be utilized to improve delivery of services in a wide-variety of programs throughout the Federal Government.
Introduction
The NIH is the steward of medical and behavioral research for the Nation. The mission of the NIH is science in pursuit of fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to extend healthy life and reduce the burden of illness and disability. The NIH is comprised of the Office of the Director and 27 research Institutes, Centers and Offices (ICOs).
Background
In 2018, the NIH was tasked with analyzing processes and implementing change to improve efficiency and effectiveness of three enterprise wide services that support the NIH research mission. These three functions consist of FOIA, Committee Management, and Ethics Support. These services are performed by crossfunctional staff in both centralized roles (e.g. establishing policy, review and approval roles), as well as decentralized roles throughout the NIH research ICOs (e.g. intake and initiation of requests, communicating with requestors).
At the beginning of this project, these functions had limited or non-existent process-related data. The processes consisted of a paper and/or electronic workflow with limited visibility. Documentation of processes utilizing a consistent or established method of process mapping was also lacking. Electronic systems were in place for certain aspects of the process workflow, however these systems were not designed to produce process performance-related metrics.